Iran’s Misty Wonders Essay

In Persepolis, by Marjane Satrapi, both the exposure and the news were sufficient to portray the primary(prenominal) idea of Marjane Satrapi Marjis life. The main idea being for us to realise at how Marji evolved into a gr profess women with struggles along the way. Through disclose both we were able to clearly go out what a difficult childhood she lived and we were able to confirm a sense of what her life was like back then. Like in many cases, the book informed us of every detail executable in order to get a cle arer message across. When it came to the pic, it lacked many expatiate that were included in the book and if you would not devote read the book it would cause you to be confused and lost. There are a play off jibes in the characterization that knock againstm to just come, there was no graphic symbol of development or leading actions involved. There was a specific scene in the movie where Marji and her mother walk past a chat that her acquire and neighbo rs are having, the female neighbor seems to have some eccentric of scar in her cheek further we are not authentic what it is and if it even matters. If we take a look at the book we see that the scene is different. Marji and her family briefly talk with their neighbors, a husband and wife, and the husband tells her father Look A bullet almost hit my wifes cheek, (44).This was a piece of information that could and should have been briefly added because it gives us a bigger picture of how dangerous their lives were during the revolution. This would only help us, the viewers, have a bigger reaction to the plot. Another example that comes to mind was the absence of trustworthy calibers. The familys maid, Mehri, as well as Marjis good friend, is neer mentioned in the movie. This was an important factor because throughout an incident that is described in the book we are able to learn the big issues with social manikin and in the movie it is something that we miss out on since it is not mentioned at only. The incident was that Mehri falls in love with the neighbors give-and-take and once Marjis father knows of this he tells Hossein, the neighbors son, that she is a maid consequently Hossein decided to stop seeing her. Marjis Father explains to Marji, You must understand that their love was impossible.Because in this country you must stay within your own social class, (37). Many of the characters are also lacked full description, for instance, Mohsen, and Anoosh. From the movie all we hear about Mohsen is that he is open up drowned in a cleanse tub and it leaves many unanswered questions such as why did it happen and who was he. In the book we know that he visited the Satrapi family the same day that Siamak visits but that is never portrayed in the movie.When it comes to Anoosh, in the movie towards the end of the explanation he is telling Marji, she asks if he has any family, and ends the conversation. On the other hand, in the book he tells Marji I marr ied and had two children, two girls And we are also able to learn that his marriage did not turn out very well. Although, there were many details missing in the movie that were included in the book, I do not think that it takes outside(a) the intention of the book. A message is clearly stated throughout the movie as well as the book. In both resources we are able to see how the main character grows up and how her surroundings, and everything she has experienced, influence the person she became. In my personal opinion I feel as if the book was to a greater extent appealing than the movie. The movie was short and brief and got to the main points of the story and was silent able to get a message across. I feel as if the book was more than detailed which made the plot clearer. Every character was described perfectly and every scene made sense and set down into place with the other scenes, so that they could all make sense.The details that are included in the book make the story brin g more emotion to the reader for the fact that everything is explained, even the smallest details. The visual style for the movie was the same as the book, both were comics. The movie is all cartoons, which is something that I found interesting. I feel that making it into a cartoon was a quick decision because it makes it so simple and easy to follow. I enjoyed the fact that I was able to understand the movie very well, although it was in French, because many of the scenes were alike(p) to the book. In the end, I think both the book and movie were enjoyable. What helped was that I had read the novel, before watching the movie. The lack of details and description of characters could have easily confused someone. On the bright side, a message was fluid able to get across through both sources.