Essay on Prerequistes of Deliberative Democracy - 1485 Words

Deliberative Democracy strives to bring people together, and discuss their problems in order to create a better form of governmental policy. However, some are skeptical of deliberative democracies ability to get individuals to communicate with one another in modern pluralistic societies like the US. When discussing important political matters, people have the tendency to not pay attention to the arguments of others, as they are only fixated on their own arguments. It is basic human nature for people to act in this way, which is the reason deliberative democrats have outlined certain prerequisites that must be followed, in order for deliberation to take place. Without these certain rules and regulations in the deliberation, it will simply†¦show more content†¦Democratic deliberation is not about which people are right and wrong, but rather getting people to gather together and discuss the issues that matter the most. It is during this active discussion amongst people that th ey start to learn about each other. Most of the time, it is a lack of knowledge that separate people from one another. Once, they start to understand each other, they can actively engage in creating policies that will benefit their society. In this deliberation, everyone has a voice and all opinions are held as equal, which give the policies created legitimacy, as everyone plays an active role. Without these ideals, respect would be lost and these deliberations would be diminished to shouting matches, which would benefit nobody. Skeptical of deliberative democracy, Rosenberg believes people do not think the way deliberative democrats assume. As explained, in an active deliberation people must practice reciprocity, publicity, and accountability, but Rosenberg believes actual deliberations are likely to stray from these standards. Although it is ambitious for deliberative democracy to ask for impartiality of one’s own opinion, this simply is not true from a psychological standp oint. Rosenberg explains people judge each other, favor their own judgment, and devalue views that contradict their own. Using developmental